Free Rice?

Hardly.

Someone recently informed me of www.freerice.com.  If you haven’t caught on to this massively popular slacktivist website, let me tell you… it’s a doozy.  Briefly, it’s a vocabulary building game where for each question you answer correctly, the site will donate 10 grains of rice to the United Nations World Food Program.  Great idea, right?  For doing virtually nothing, you could be feeding the world, no?  It almost sounds too good to be true. 

Well, yes and no.  It’s actually pretty simple.  The site has sponsors who put banner ads along the bottom of each question.  Each click earns the site money from these advertisers, which is where the money comes from to buy this rice.  There’s really nothing magic about it.

But what gets me is just how little people are really doing when they think that they’re really doing something great.  The concept itself doesn’t bother me so much… I actually admire the ingenuity and creativity of the creators of the site, but I think people are falsely thinking that they’re making a real difference when their time (and money) could be spent much better in doing so many other things.

If you know me, you know that two of my biggest pet peeves is 1. People taking advantage of others’ ignorance for personal gain and 2. Slacktivism.  Now, I’m not accusing freerice.com of victimizing the populace, but they’re definitely taking advantage of the general desire of people wanting to feel like they’re doing something seemingly great while putting forth minimal effort (i.e. slacktivism).

I think people get the warm-fuzzies seeing all that rice collecting out to the side and imagining some poor person somewhere thanking God in heaven that you knew that the word “phlegmatic” meant “sluggish.”  But I don’t think they realize just how much of a royal waste of time it really is.  In ten minutes I was able to procure 700 grains of rice.  I think I have a pretty extensive vocabulary, so I think this is a fair rate (the site adjusts to your level of vocabulary, actually).

So, as I’ve said so many times before… let’s do the math:

So for my ten minutes of work, I donated the equivalent of… $0.002 – or two-tenths of one penny.  If I had played for a whole hour, I would have broken the ONE penny milestone.

“So what?” you may ask… “at least it’s SOMETHING,” you may say. 

Not really.

Let’s do some comparing…

  • If you donated ONE measly dollar of actual money for this cause, it would be the equivalent of playing this game for about THREE DAYS straight… no bathroom breaks, no eating breaks (and I’m sure after three days of not eating, you’ll want to donate some of that rice to yourself).
  • You are actually burning calories while playing this game.  If you eat about $12 of food per day, your caloric spending rate is 50 cents per hour on average.  So by playing this game, you are actually LOSING over 48 cents per hour… or a return of -97% on your investment.
  • If, instead of clicking a mouse for an hour, you worked at MINIMUM wage ($5.85/hr) and donated that money to buy rice, you could have donated over 58 pounds of rice… or the equivalent of playing the game for over 400 hours.

You might think it’s harmless, but I believe that it’s actually harming real efforts to make a real difference.  This kind of thing makes people think they’re doing something when they’re really not.  People are ambivalent enough as it is, but something like this makes people falsely believe they’re not.  It satisfies our consumer mentality of receiving the good feeling of activism without any real cost.

Now, I know that it’s not completely worthless… according to their website, they’ve donated the equivalent of almost 4 billion grains of rice so far.  But imagine the millions of people it took to get that total, who may have had an opportunity to do something more worthwhile.  In economics, lost opportunity is a cost… and, again, this one is a doozy.  Four billion grains of rice would cost about $13k… not peanuts, but if you gathered a million people and could only collect enough money to buy a nice used car, how sad is that?

Join the Conversation

  1. Unknown's avatar

22 Comments

  1. I’m glad someone noticed how ridiculous this was. Nice use of mathematical evidence, there.By the way, you can now by Hershey’s candy to Support Breast Cancer…or something…

  2. I agree with your reasoning, although I think you may have overlooked one minor detail. While not significant enough to make the site worthwhile, the game could help users develop their vocabulary skills.

  3. Good point. I think it sounds silly. It’s like saving the tops on your pop can to fund dialysis etc. You have to drink sooo much pop to get even one jar of those tops and then you get overweight from drinking all the pop and have health problems of your own. Why not just donate some money!

  4. Sorry, have to disagree with your analysis. Initially, I also thought freerice.com wasn’t worth the time it takes because, as you aptly illustrated, choosing to instead work actual jobs or donate money straight up would be more effective. But the kicker is (sad truth though it may be), most people would much rather play the game than donate their time/money. In fact, I would say very few people are replacing their philanthropist time with freerice.com (or other slacktivist activities). If not playing freerice.com, most people would be spending their time on other leisure activities instead, the only difference being that these activities have zero redeeming value, as opposed to freerice.com which at least has minimal beneficial value. So the real analysis one would have to do is a comparison (net-gain calculation) of how much time/money is being mismanaged or wasted by people who are replacing their philanthropist time with freerice.com vs. how much money is being generated by people who would otherwise be doing activities with zero beneficial value. That’s a much harder calculation, but I think that’s the real question.

  5. the reality is the reality. most people don’t give a donkey’s butt about world hunger. they care about their own hunger. i’m all for “conning” people into donating some rice while they think they’re playing a game. i also believe that awareness grows from something small to something bigger. maybe as someone plays freerice, it gets them to start thinking a little more about hunger and poverty. which could lead to bigger things. in the end, something is better than nothing at all.

  6. I enjoy your blog extremely much…This post was FANTASTIC – my #1 pet peeve is also “1. People taking advantage of others’ ignorance for personal gain” if I may quote.  Now could you just do a study on how many people really care about global warming vs. how much they make off of it? ie. celebrities, network tv, etc…and blog it =)

  7. it’s hot that u can figure out all that math. i realize ur logic + completely agree. but the problem is people r tentative abt giving away their ‘money’ more so than a little of their time (during one sitting). sure, it would make sense to just work for fewer hrs and b able to give more but who’s going to go out + get a minimum wage paying job to give to people living hundreds of miles away who they’ve never seen before so they can buy some food? for that matter, who wants to work a minimum paying job? after a hard day at that kind of job, they wouldn’t b feeling charitable enough to give anything away. they feel that they’ve ‘worked’ for it, so just like their regular job that they have to support themselves, it doesn’t feel right to just give their hard-earned money away. please try to see it as a way for people to do something to make the world a better place. i kno it’s easier for me to just agree w/ everything u say, but this may not b good as u would b discouraging others from helping out on freerice.com. try to think of it as people doing something at all, rather than just sitting at home surfing the net for nothing. a few million people can only generate $13000. there r 6+ billion people so doing the math gives ~$300,000/yr(??) this can surely make a difference, don’t u think? it is definitely lost productivity as u said, but it’s not lost productivity if there’s no productivity to begin with. people will want to kick back (be unproductive anyways) and surf the net in a relaxing manner rather than pick up a minimum wage job to help out. it’s somewhat similar to what is known as the ‘foot-in-the-door’ approach. once u get people to open up to the idea of being able to make a difference in the lives of people miles away overseas who they’ve never seen, they’re more willing to help in other ways, ie. as u said, to actually donate money from their hard-earned check. familiarity breeds like. please don’t take my comment personally. i appreciate that u brought the subject up, and it definitely gave me something interesting to read 🙂

  8. u can donate money urself, u know, relishing in the idea that u kno u’re saving urself time but also knowing u’ve got other millions of people supporting the same cause, just not to the extent u r.

  9. see, it’s already gotten u frustrated abt how to maximize ur efforts to help when otherwise u would b aimlessly surfing the net, and it’s gotten someone up there frustrated abt y she can’t just mail them a bag of rice. foot-in-the-door in full effect. if u really to want to help, u can donate to world vision rather than mail a bag of rice cuz there’s shipping + handling money that would b better spent on the rice itself. world vision delivers in bulk, so it saves money on transportation. rather than discourage people from using freerice.com, u can encourage it as well as them donating to world vision :)sorry abt the many comments..i’m just kinda restless these days

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply to seejaybee14Cancel reply

Discover more from Nathon's Old Xanga Site

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading